What a pity that it’s so hard to learn, has such an unpleasant command line interface, and treats its users with such utter contempt. It has a powerful distributed model which allows advanced users to do tricky things with branches, and rewriting history. It is actually an issue with how Steam installed that file on the system.Git is the source code version control system that is rapidly becoming the standard for open source projects. NOTE: For Linux, some users may experience problems with the editor or game finding the libsteamapi.so file even with it right there in the directory. Do not, however, ship your steamappid.txt file it is a harmless file to include by Valve recommends you do not.Update your software that should actually open loadable bundles.Assuming you are using the same Steam account and own the game, first install the game. Now select another program and check the box 'Always use this app to open. , right-click on any BUNDLE file and then click 'Open with' > 'Choose another app'. It means spending a long time just trying to start a game which would otherwise start Windows Mac Linux iPhone Android. I also notice steam freezes up very regularly at startup and I need to force quit, log out and try again. The next time I start steam it does it all over again.
Versions are linear, with the odd merge. In fact, branches are tags, and files you already know about, so you really need to learn three new things. That’s pretty much everything you need to know. As a point of reference, consider Subversion: you have files, a working directory, a repository, versions, branches, and tags. Without knowing which game you are working with we cannot help you any further.The information model is complicated – and you need to know all of it. If so you can delete it If you want to access the log file of the game, please proceed to the 'Seasons after FallData' folder.The command line syntax is completely arbitrary and inconsistent. You are in the game folder Please make sure there is no 'steamappid.txt' next to the game executable. ( I'm doesn't pick a picture because this is an easier step and if you can't do it you're not able to create a real game so sorry :c ) Next step we need to create a bat file and put these text to the bat file.Step 4. If you failure this step you're stupid and don't continue the tutorial. Crazy command line syntaxSo download installer(or zip) install(or extract) the files. The various options of “git reset” do completely different things.The most spectacular example of this is the command “git am”, which as far as I can tell, is something Linus hacked up and forced into the main codebase to solve a problem he was having one night. Specifying filenames completely changes the semantics of some commands (“git commit” ignores local, unstaged changes in foo.txt “git commit foo.txt” doesn’t). But the shortcut for “git branch” combined with “git checkout”? “git checkout -b”. Extract .Git File Steam Game Series Of CommitsLeaky abstractionMost of the power of Git is aimed squarely at maintainers of codebases: people who have to merge contributions from a wide number of different sources, or who have to ensure a number of parallel development efforts result in a single, coherent, stable release. Keep using Git, and more concepts will occasionally drop out of the sky: refs, tags, the reflog, fast-forward commits, detached head state (!), remote branches, tracking, namespaces 5. Information model sprawlRemember the complicated information model in step 1? It keeps growing, like a cancer. Case in point:Git-push – Update remote refs along with associated objectsHere’s a description for humans: git-push – Upload changes from your local repository into a remote repositoryGit-rebase – Forward-port local commits to the updated upstream headTranslation: git-rebase – Sequentially regenerate a series of commits so they can be applied directly to the head node 4. They describe the commands from the perspective of a computer scientist, not a user. Crappy documentationThe man pages are one almighty “fuck you”. You can make any changes you like, and you can always get it back”. Unsafe version controlThe fundamental promise of any version control system is this: “Once you put your precious source code in here, it’s safe. Someone could quite conceivably write an improved interface (easygit is a start) that hides unhelpful complexity such as the index and the local repository. “Git is good” is true if speaking of architecture – but false of user interface. It’s simply the result of ignoring the needs of normal users, and confusing architecture with interface. Git is a 4 handle, dual boiler espresso machine – when all they need is instant.Interestingly, I don’t think this trade-off is inherent in Git’s design. Git history is a bunch of liesThe primary output of development work should be source code. Why would you do this to new contributors – those with nothing invested in the project, and every incentive to throw their hands up and leave? 9. Everyone else only had to update, commit, update, commit, update, commit… Git dumps the burden of understanding complex version control on everyone – while making the maintainer’s job easier. Burden of VCS maintainance pushed to contributorsIn the traditional open source project, only one person had to deal with the complexities of branches and merges: the maintainer. / … / git push -f origin master8. The comparison between a Subversion repository with commit access and a Git repository without it isn’t fair True. Thought I’d address some of the most frequent comments. Update (August 3, 2012)This post has obviously struck a nerve, and gets a lot of traffic. Simple tasks need so many commandsThe “bread and butter” commands and concepts needed to work with a Github-hosted project.If the power of Git is sophisticated branching and merging, then its weakness is the complexity of simple tasks. Surely the correct solution is a better log output that can filter out these unwanted merges. So rebase encourages you to lie in order to provide other developers with a “clean”, “uncluttered” history. You’re just used to SVN There’s some truth to this, even though I haven’t done a huge amount of coding in SVN-based projects. Perhaps someone else would like to do a fairer apples-to-apples comparison. Git (or at least Github) repositories tend not to: you’re expected to submit pull requests, even after you reach the “trusted” stage. But very soon you need rebase, push, pull, fetch , merge, status, log, and the annoyingly-commandless “pull request”. You can just barely survive for a while with clone, add, commit, and checkout. That hasn’t been my experience at all. But you only need a few basic commands to get by. You can be against a UI without being against the product. But my life is so much better with Git, why are you against it? I’m not – I actually quite like the architecture and what it lets you do. This post is about Git’s deficiencies. Subversion has even worse problems! Probably. Use Mercurial instead! Sure, if you’re the lucky person who gets to choose the VCS used by your project. There’s a flaw in point X. If you can’t understand it, you must be dumb. True to an extent, but see the previous point. The point is, the tool is hard to learn and should be improved. As a programmer, it’s worth investing time learning your tools. True, but beside the point. Macx video converter pro for mac ossierra– a tool to support Vincent Driessent’s branching model. Overall, the level of debate has actually been pretty good, so thank you all.To reset one file in your working directory to its committed state: git checkout file.txtTo reset every file in your working directory to its committed state: git reset -hardRemotes and branches git checkout remotename/branchnameThere’s another command where the separator is remotename:branchname, but I don’t recall right now.Creates a branch but does nothing with itStores modifications to tracked files, then rolls them backLists local and remote tracking branches shows latest commit messageLets you rewrite the upstream history of a branch, choosing which commits to keep, squash, or ditch.Returns to another commit, but doesn’t touch working directory.Stages all local modifications/additions/deletions If I’d known it would be so popular, I would have tried harder. All the many flaws, inaccuracies, mischaracterisations, generalisations and biases have been brought to light. Probably over 1000 have commented on it, on Reddit (530 comments), on Hacker News (250 comments), here (100 comments). Git doesn’t say “sorry about the complexity, we’ve done everything we can to make it easy”, it says “Git’s hard, deal with it”. I think it’s hard to use because its developers never tried, and because they don’t value good user interfaces – including command lines. I don’t think Git is hard to use because it’s powerful.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorCorey ArchivesCategories |